tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5143276828446077324.post3349207669799929700..comments2024-02-23T23:28:28.619+08:00Comments on 哲學哲學雞蛋糕: 邏輯上可能/物理上可能朱家安http://www.blogger.com/profile/08805839838132417271noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5143276828446077324.post-37442241842685314542011-07-27T12:49:45.077+08:002011-07-27T12:49:45.077+08:00應該是密度…應該是密度…simonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5143276828446077324.post-13766747792887798412008-12-05T11:55:00.000+08:002008-12-05T11:55:00.000+08:00fake9527:嘿,我剛剛才發現你的質疑來自於哪裡。我已經把文章裡的筆誤修正了,謝謝你。fake9527:<BR/><BR/>嘿,我剛剛才發現你的質疑來自於哪裡。<BR/><BR/>我已經把文章裡的筆誤修正了,謝謝你。朱家安https://www.blogger.com/profile/08805839838132417271noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5143276828446077324.post-37431511367138729642008-11-04T08:30:00.000+08:002008-11-04T08:30:00.000+08:00哈囉,fake9527:是的,我想,只要物理定律維持不變,鐵會比同體積的棉花擁有比較大的質量。哈囉,fake9527:<BR/><BR/>是的,我想,只要物理定律維持不變,鐵會比同體積的棉花擁有比較大的質量。朱家安https://www.blogger.com/profile/08805839838132417271noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5143276828446077324.post-25209725924820536312008-11-02T14:01:00.000+08:002008-11-02T14:01:00.000+08:00鐵的質量不可以比綿花小?鐵的質量不可以比綿花小?nonospoonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10110605353873706304noreply@blogger.com