tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5143276828446077324.post9037077563997501262..comments2024-02-23T23:28:28.619+08:00Comments on 哲學哲學雞蛋糕: 不在乎定義的學術朱家安http://www.blogger.com/profile/08805839838132417271noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5143276828446077324.post-43923347105437405492013-03-31T01:08:23.058+08:002013-03-31T01:08:23.058+08:00作者已經移除這則留言。Mithrilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00387070037421179253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5143276828446077324.post-85736954111830665942013-03-31T01:07:12.314+08:002013-03-31T01:07:12.314+08:00作者已經移除這則留言。Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15844627421691938548noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5143276828446077324.post-67761997605439132562013-03-23T18:06:55.821+08:002013-03-23T18:06:55.821+08:00嘿!ns2a2002
我想有許多學術都會談到"人"
但各個體系對人的定義雖然不一...嘿!ns2a2002<br />我想有許多學術都會談到"人"<br />但各個體系對人的定義雖然不一樣.但體系內通常是一樣的.<br />我想給定任何一體系的定義應該都能說是正當的回答...Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09775411336885932479noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5143276828446077324.post-77701598013995975842009-06-27T22:20:21.426+08:002009-06-27T22:20:21.426+08:00To:AlfredEgo
@"質數def=除了一和自己本身以外沒有其他因數的數"...To:AlfredEgo<br />@"質數def=除了一和自己本身以外沒有其他因數的數"<br />在大部分情況下...此定義不適用在1...<br />http://203.68.20.65/science/content/1999/00010349/0013.htm<br />To:Yel D'ohan<br />這...光是胚胎算不算是人就很有爭議了...<br />生物學上的"人"和其他領域所談的"人"的概念也許不會一樣.ns2a2002https://www.blogger.com/profile/06257922860147064085noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5143276828446077324.post-48339782518896571642009-06-26T20:09:04.246+08:002009-06-26T20:09:04.246+08:00在紙條上寫下:
質數def=除了一和自己本身以外沒有其他因數的數
交給老師吧.在紙條上寫下:<br />質數def=除了一和自己本身以外沒有其他因數的數<br />交給老師吧.AlfredEgonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5143276828446077324.post-998959392065288092009-06-26T13:56:57.351+08:002009-06-26T13:56:57.351+08:00何謂「人」XD
路邊隨便一個學過生物學的都能回答。何謂「人」XD<br />路邊隨便一個學過生物學的都能回答。Yel D'ohanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05726077000937955989noreply@blogger.com